standardized devices Search Results


93
LGC Standards hela cell line
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Hela Cell Line, supplied by LGC Standards, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hela cell line/product/LGC Standards
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hela cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International buffer components
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Buffer Components, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/buffer components/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
buffer components - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc pclamp data acquisition software
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Pclamp Data Acquisition Software, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pclamp data acquisition software/product/Danaher Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pclamp data acquisition software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc electrophysiology
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Electrophysiology, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/electrophysiology/product/Danaher Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electrophysiology - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Salimetrics LLC standard collection devices salimerics
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard Collection Devices Salimerics, supplied by Salimetrics LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard collection devices salimerics/product/Salimetrics LLC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard collection devices salimerics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Trophy Radiologie S A standard radiography device trophy radiologie 77437
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard Radiography Device Trophy Radiologie 77437, supplied by Trophy Radiologie S A, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard radiography device trophy radiologie 77437/product/Trophy Radiologie S A
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard radiography device trophy radiologie 77437 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute point-of-care devices
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Point Of Care Devices, supplied by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/point-of-care devices/product/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
point-of-care devices - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SD Biosensor standard q covid-19 lfa (conjugated with colour provides: test device, extraction buver tube, filter cap, sterile np)
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Standard Q Covid 19 Lfa (Conjugated With Colour Provides: Test Device, Extraction Buver Tube, Filter Cap, Sterile Np), supplied by SD Biosensor, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard q covid-19 lfa (conjugated with colour provides: test device, extraction buver tube, filter cap, sterile np)/product/SD Biosensor
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard q covid-19 lfa (conjugated with colour provides: test device, extraction buver tube, filter cap, sterile np) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Standard Diagnostics Inc one-step syphilis anti-tp test (colloidal gold device)
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
One Step Syphilis Anti Tp Test (Colloidal Gold Device), supplied by Standard Diagnostics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/one-step syphilis anti-tp test (colloidal gold device)/product/Standard Diagnostics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
one-step syphilis anti-tp test (colloidal gold device) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Johns Hopkins HealthCare clinical wireless device standard
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Clinical Wireless Device Standard, supplied by Johns Hopkins HealthCare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/clinical wireless device standard/product/Johns Hopkins HealthCare
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
clinical wireless device standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
National Institute of Standards and Technology α-in2se3 retinomorphic sensor array
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
α In2se3 Retinomorphic Sensor Array, supplied by National Institute of Standards and Technology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/α-in2se3 retinomorphic sensor array/product/National Institute of Standards and Technology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
α-in2se3 retinomorphic sensor array - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
National Institute of Standards and Technology broadband optoelectronic device
( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into <t>HeLa</t> cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).
Broadband Optoelectronic Device, supplied by National Institute of Standards and Technology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/broadband optoelectronic device/product/National Institute of Standards and Technology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
broadband optoelectronic device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).

Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine

Article Title: ENOblock synergizes with colistin to treat Acinetobacter baumannii infections

doi: 10.1038/s44321-025-00331-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Time-kill curves of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 2xMIC ENOblock for 24 h. ( B ) Membrane permeabilization of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains in the presence of 0.5xMIC ENOblock, incubated for 10 min, was quantified by Typhon Scanner. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent replicates and experiments. * P = 0.001: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock(two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains adhesion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.015: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.02: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). Analysis of E. coli Ec MCR1 + and Kp10 strains invasion into HeLa cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means ± SEM, * P = 0.002: Ec MCR1 + vs Ec MCR1 + + ENOblock and * P = 0.037: Kp10 vs Kp10 + ENOblock treatment (two-tailed Student’s t test).

Article Snippet: HeLa Cell Line , LGC Standards , Cat# ATCC-CCL-2.

Techniques: Membrane, Incubation, Two Tailed Test

( A ) Schematic of the bacterial adhesion/invasion assay. ( B ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains adhesion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.023: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.048: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.018: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.035: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains invasion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1×MIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.011: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.002: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( D ) Immunostaining of fibronectin of HeLa cells (magenta) and Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains (green) pretreated with ENOblock (0× and 1×MIC), after bacterial adherence for 2 h, was performed by specific primary antibodies against both strains and their respective secondary antibodies. Blue staining shows the location of HeLa cell nuclei. A representative image out of three biological replicates is shown. .

Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine

Article Title: ENOblock synergizes with colistin to treat Acinetobacter baumannii infections

doi: 10.1038/s44321-025-00331-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of the bacterial adhesion/invasion assay. ( B ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains adhesion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1xMIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.023: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.048: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.018: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.035: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( C ) Analysis of Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains invasion into HeLa and macrophage cells with (1×MIC) and without ENOblock treatment. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, For HeLa cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.011: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). For macrophage cells, * P = 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Ab ATCC 17978 + ENOblock and * P = 0.002: Ab CR17 vs Ab CR17 + ENOblock (two-tailed Student’s t test). ( D ) Immunostaining of fibronectin of HeLa cells (magenta) and Ab ATCC 17978 and Ab CR17 strains (green) pretreated with ENOblock (0× and 1×MIC), after bacterial adherence for 2 h, was performed by specific primary antibodies against both strains and their respective secondary antibodies. Blue staining shows the location of HeLa cell nuclei. A representative image out of three biological replicates is shown. .

Article Snippet: HeLa Cell Line , LGC Standards , Cat# ATCC-CCL-2.

Techniques: Invasion Assay, Two Tailed Test, Immunostaining, Staining

( A ) PCA plot of TMT data from Ab infected macrophages and epithelial cells of three biological replicates each group. ( B ) Venn diagrams showing the overlap of DEGs between the two comparisons: Ab infected macrophages vs Ab infected epithelial cells. The upper panel shows overlaps of overexpressed proteins, while the lower panel shows overlaps of downexpressed proteins. A total of six proteins were found to be commonly overexpressed in Ab upon exposure to both epithelial and macrophage cells: enolase, tyrosine–tRNA ligase, malonyl-CoA:acyl carrier protein transacylase, N-succinylarginine dihydrolase, carbonic anhydrase, and biotin carboxylase. Additionally, one protein, isocitrate dehydrogenase, was consistently downregulated in response to both cell types. ( C ) COG category distribution of DEPs. The overexpressed and downexpressed proteins in each comparison are categorized by their COG functional groups, with blue representing downexpressed proteins and orange representing overexpressed proteins. ( D ) Volcano plots depicting the DEPs for the two comparisons. Proteins significantly overexpressed are shown in red, while significantly downexpressed proteins are shown in blue. Enolase overexpression is shown in green. Non-significant proteins are indicated in black. Three biological replicates from each group were compared. ( E ) A. baumannii Ab ATCC 17978 and Δ eno strains, with or without supplementation of 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, adhesion to HeLa cells. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, and Student t test was used for statistical analysis. * P = 0.006: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno and * P < 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno + PEP (two-tailed Student’s t test). MΦ macrophage cells, Epit epithelial cells. .

Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine

Article Title: ENOblock synergizes with colistin to treat Acinetobacter baumannii infections

doi: 10.1038/s44321-025-00331-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) PCA plot of TMT data from Ab infected macrophages and epithelial cells of three biological replicates each group. ( B ) Venn diagrams showing the overlap of DEGs between the two comparisons: Ab infected macrophages vs Ab infected epithelial cells. The upper panel shows overlaps of overexpressed proteins, while the lower panel shows overlaps of downexpressed proteins. A total of six proteins were found to be commonly overexpressed in Ab upon exposure to both epithelial and macrophage cells: enolase, tyrosine–tRNA ligase, malonyl-CoA:acyl carrier protein transacylase, N-succinylarginine dihydrolase, carbonic anhydrase, and biotin carboxylase. Additionally, one protein, isocitrate dehydrogenase, was consistently downregulated in response to both cell types. ( C ) COG category distribution of DEPs. The overexpressed and downexpressed proteins in each comparison are categorized by their COG functional groups, with blue representing downexpressed proteins and orange representing overexpressed proteins. ( D ) Volcano plots depicting the DEPs for the two comparisons. Proteins significantly overexpressed are shown in red, while significantly downexpressed proteins are shown in blue. Enolase overexpression is shown in green. Non-significant proteins are indicated in black. Three biological replicates from each group were compared. ( E ) A. baumannii Ab ATCC 17978 and Δ eno strains, with or without supplementation of 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, adhesion to HeLa cells. The data are presented as means of three biological replicates ± SEM, and Student t test was used for statistical analysis. * P = 0.006: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno and * P < 0.001: Ab ATCC 17978 vs Δ eno + PEP (two-tailed Student’s t test). MΦ macrophage cells, Epit epithelial cells. .

Article Snippet: HeLa Cell Line , LGC Standards , Cat# ATCC-CCL-2.

Techniques: Infection, Comparison, Functional Assay, Over Expression, Two Tailed Test